Aren't we all searching for something?

Not sure what to search? Here are some topics that we can suggest you:

Taking Stock: Comparing State and Central Pensions Schemes

old couple

Image Source :

India's pension system has evolved significantly, featuring a mix of central and state schemes. This article explores these differences, aiding readers in informed retirement planning and contributing to pension reform discussions.

India's pension system has evolved significantly over the years, with the introduction of new schemes and the amendment of existing ones. The current pension landscape in India is characterized by a complex mix of central and state-sponsored schemes, each offering unique benefits and challenges. This article aims to provide an overview of the Indian pension system, focusing on the key differences between state and central pensions. By understanding these differences, readers can make informed decisions about their retirement planning and contribute to the ongoing debate on pension reforms in India.

In India, the pension system covers a small percentage of the workforce. According to the 2011 census, approximately 12% of the workforce, or approximately 58 million people, are covered under various pension systems.   

Structure of the Pension System in India

The Indian pension system is a complex web of central and state-sponsored schemes. The Employees' Provident Fund Organization (EPFO) manages the Employees' Provident Fund (EPF) and Employees' Pension Scheme (EPS), which are compulsory for establishments with 20 or more employees. The National Pension System (NPS) is an optional pension scheme meant for all Indian citizens, including government employees. The Public Provident Fund (PPF) and the Senior Citizens' Savings Scheme (SCSS) are also popular savings options for retirement.

Lack of awareness has been a significant challenge for the National Pension System (NPS) in India, with only 6.24 crore subscribers out of the country's 52 crore workers, highlighting the need for increased education and promotion of pension products.   

Comparative Analysis: State vs. Central Pensions

A detailed comparison of state and central pension schemes reveals several key differences. State pensions are typically more generous in terms of benefits, as they are funded by state governments. Central pensions, on the other hand, are funded by the central government and often offer lower benefits. Contribution amounts and tax implications also differ between state and central pensions.

Now let’s delve deeper into the structure of the Indian pension system, exploring the various schemes and their implications for retirement planning.

Around 93% of the labor force in India is employed in the informal sector, yet most pension schemes are directed towards the organized sector, leaving a significant portion of the workforce without retirement income security.   

Government Pension Plans

National Pension Scheme (NPS)

NPS offers flexibility, tax benefits, and controlled risk, making it a tempting and ideal choice for retirement planning. The NPS is a defined-contribution pension system regulated by the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority (PFRDA). It offers transparency, portability, and the flexibility to choose investment options with varying ratios of equity and fixed-income instruments. Employers contribute 8.33% for their employees under this scheme, and the retirement age is fixed at 58 years.

Atal Pension Yojana (APY)

APY is a government-backed scheme designed to provide financial security to underprivileged senior citizens. This scheme is specifically designed for the unorganized sectors of India. Individuals between 18 to 40 years can opt for this scheme, contributing monthly amounts to receive periodic pension payments ranging from ₹1,000 to ₹5,000 based on their contributions.

Pradhan Mantri Vaya Vandana Yojana (PMVVY)

PMVVY is a risk-free scheme offering steady income, tax benefits, and loan facilities to ensure a secure retirement. 

Employee Pension Scheme (EPS)

EPS provides financial security to organized sector employees with contributions from both employees and employers. The minimum monthly pension amount is Rs. 1,000. Employees need to have served a minimum of 10 years to avail of these benefits, with various types of pension options available such as child pension and widow pension.

Public Provident Fund (PPF)

PPF is a long-term investment scheme with a tenure of 15 years, offering tax benefits and a maximum annual investment limit of ₹1.5 lakh.

India's pension system is complex and fragmented, consisting of a wide variety of schemes. The basic structure involves public pensions that cater to different segments of the population. However, the system faces several challenges and limitations, particularly in terms of coverage for the majority of the workforce.

Despite having over 300 million employed individuals in the working-age population, less than 12% are covered by retirement benefit schemes in India.    

State Pension Schemes

Each state has its own pension schemes in addition to the government pension schemes. For example, in Maharashtra, there are several state pension schemes aimed at providing financial security to different segments of the population. Some notable state pension schemes in Maharashtra include:

Shravanbal Seva State Pension Scheme

This scheme provides a monthly pension of ₹600 to destitute individuals in the state of Maharashtra. It is designed to support those in need and offers a source of regular income for eligible citizens.

Indira Gandhi National Old Age Pension Scheme

Under this scheme, beneficiaries receive Rs. 200 from the Government of India and Rs. 400 from the Government of Maharashtra through the Shravanbal Seva Rajya Nivrutti Vetan Yojana. This initiative aims to provide financial assistance to elderly individuals for their well-being and security.

Current Pension System in India

The Indian pension system lacks a universal social security system to protect the elderly from economic deprivation. Instead, it relies heavily on financing through employer and employee participation, which limits coverage to organized sector workers. This leaves a significant portion of the workforce without access to any formal system of old-age income security. The growth in unorganized employment further diminishes coverage, exacerbating the issue.

Tax implications for state and central pensions differ, with state pensions potentially being subject to state income taxes and central pensions potentially being subject to federal income taxes.    

Coverage Limitations and Challenges Faced by the Majority of the Workforce

1. Inequity in Benefits

Within the organized labour force with access to formal retirement income systems, there is a disparity between public and private workers. Public workers often receive more generous treatment compared to private workers, leading to further fragmentation in the pension system.

2. Pressure on Public Finances

The escalating expenditure on non-contributory, unfunded public pension programs is straining government budgets. Without intervention, these schemes may become financially unsustainable in the near future.

3. Low Returns from Provident Funds

Conservative investment norms for provident funds have resulted in inadequate returns for workers. This poses a challenge in ensuring sufficient income security during retirement.

4. Underdeveloped Private Annuity Market

The lack of pension annuities and health insurance coverage complicates old-age economic security for individuals. Addressing this gap is crucial for enhancing retirement planning options for the workforce.

The current state of the Indian pension system reflects a need for comprehensive reform to address these coverage limitations and challenges faced by a significant portion of the workforce. Efforts to reform the system have been initiated but require a more coherent and sustainable approach to ensure long-term financial security for retirees across different sectors of employment.

The Indian pension system is complex and fragmented, consisting of a wide variety of schemes.    

Motivations for Reforming the Current System

The Indian pension system is at a critical juncture, necessitating comprehensive reforms to address existing challenges and ensure sustainable retirement income security for all citizens. Several key motivations drive the need for reforming the current system, highlighting the pressing need for change to enhance equity, financial sustainability, and returns for retirees.

Overview of Recent Institutional Developments Related to Pensions in India

Recent institutional developments in India's pension sector have aimed to address the complexities and challenges inherent in the existing system. Efforts have been made to enhance coverage, improve benefits, and ensure financial sustainability for retirees. These developments show a growing recognition of the need for comprehensive reforms to create a more inclusive and effective pension landscape.

As of December 2021, the total assets under management (AUM) in the NPS system are ₹61,000 crore.   

Impact of These Developments on the Pension Landscape

1. Addressing Fragmentation: The fragmented nature of the Indian pension system, characterized by diverse benefit schemes and disparities between public and private sector workers, has prompted recent institutional reforms to streamline and harmonize pension provisions. By promoting greater coherence and uniformity in benefits, these developments seek to reduce distortions in the labour market and enhance equity in retirement income security.
2. Financial Sustainability: The escalating expenditure on public pension programs has put significant pressure on government budgets. Recent initiatives have focused on containing costs, exploring innovative financing mechanisms, and enhancing efficiency to ensure the long-term financial sustainability of pension schemes. By addressing these financial challenges, the reforms aim to safeguard the viability of pension programs and prevent future fiscal strains.
3. Enhancing Returns and Coverage: Reforms have also targeted improving returns from provident funds and extending coverage to the unorganized sector. Efforts to diversify investment options, optimize returns, and expand access to formal retirement income systems are intended to address gaps in coverage and provide greater financial security for a larger segment of the workforce. These developments aim to bridge disparities in benefits distribution and promote a more inclusive pension landscape.

Comparison with Global Pension System Frameworks

The Indian pension system differs from global frameworks in several ways. While global systems often focus on defined contribution (DC) schemes, India's pension system is more complex, with a mix of defined benefit (DB) and DC schemes. Additionally, India's pension sector faces unique challenges, such as the high incidence of administrative costs and low real rates of return, which have made the existing system unsustainable.

State pensions often require higher contribution rates from employees and employers, while central pensions may have lower contribution rates.   

Demand for Restoration of Old Pension Scheme (OPS)

The demand to go back to the Old Pension Scheme (OPS) for central government employees in India has gained momentum, with calls for reverting to the previous pension system instead of the National Pension Scheme (NPS). This demand has sparked debates and discussions surrounding the implications of such a shift and the government's stance on the matter.

Employees and pensioners, particularly in states like Rajasthan, Punjab, and Chhattisgarh, have been vocal in their demand to bring back the OPS, citing concerns over the NPS's structure and benefits. The OPS is favored for its perceived advantages in providing more secure and predictable retirement benefits compared to the NPS.

Central pensions offer lower benefits due to lower contribution rates from the central government.    

Government Stance on OPS vs. NPS and Its Implications

The Government of India has clarified that there is currently no proposal under consideration to restore the old pension scheme for central government employees. The government's preference for the NPS over the OPS is based on factors such as cost-effectiveness, sustainability, and alignment with modern pension practices.

- Implications: The decision to maintain the NPS over the OPS reflects a strategic shift towards defined contribution schemes and away from traditional defined benefit schemes. While the NPS offers flexibility and portability, some argue that it lacks the security and assured benefits provided by the OPS.

The ongoing debate between proponents of the OPS and supporters of the NPS underscores the complexities involved in pension system reforms and highlights the importance of balancing cost-efficiency with retirement income security for government employees.

State pensions are typically more generous in terms of benefits compared to central pensions.    

Future Outlook

The Indian pension sector is poised for significant changes in the coming years. Policymakers are working to transform pension systems to meet present and future challenges, ensuring adequate retirement income for all citizens. The future landscape of the Indian pension sector is likely to evolve in several ways, including:

1. Expansion of National Pension Scheme (NPS)

The NPS is expected to expand its coverage, particularly in the private sector, both for salaried and self-employed individuals. This expansion will likely be driven by enhanced pension literacy and increased awareness of the importance of retirement planning.

2. Increased Role of Private Sector

The private sector is expected to play a more significant role in the future pension landscape, with private pension schemes becoming more prevalent. This shift will be facilitated by the voluntary nature of the NPS and the growing recognition of the need for diversified retirement income options.

3. Addressing Policy Risks

The Indian pension sector faces policy risks, such as the government's ability to pay required pension outlays. Policymakers will need to address these risks to ensure the sustainability of the pension system and protect the retirement benefits of current and future retirees.

4. Improving Financial Literacy

Low financial literacy and attitudes towards savings, risk, and retirement planning pose challenges to achieving optimal coverage in the Indian pension sector. Enhancing financial literacy and promoting responsible savings habits will be crucial for the future success of the pension system.

In conclusion, the Indian pension system faces several challenges, particularly in terms of coverage and financial sustainability. To address these issues, policymakers should prioritize comprehensive reforms that promote greater inclusivity, efficiency, and financial security for all citizens.